On 03/10/2015 08:18 PM, Ying Xue wrote: > Sorry, I did not realize the case when I created the commit. However, > although I > don't understand its scenario, in my opinion, adding one redundant argument > for > all sockets to satisfy the special case seems unreasonable for us.
In my opinion this is not about a single, special case, but rather about being able to support asynchronous operations on socket interface. It is important for AF_ALG since we have crypto HW accelerators, that people want to access from user space, but in the future there might be other use cases. Regards, Tadeusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
