Hi Herbert,
On 27 November 2015 at 14:12, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborow...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> @@ -75,9 +76,22 @@ static int crypto_akcipher_init_tfm(struct crypto_tfm
>> *tfm)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void crypto_akcipher_free_instance(struct crypto_instance *inst)
>> +{
>> + struct akcipher_instance *akcipher = akcipher_instance(inst);
>> +
>> + if (!akcipher->free) {
>> + inst->tmpl->free(inst);
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> You don't need this bit. AEAD has it because there were legacy
> templates but you are starting from a clean slate.
You're right there aren't any users that need this now but again is
there any reason you prefer the inst->free approach?
BTW note the lines that assign inst->free in crypto/gcm.c end with
commas which could lead to confusion.
Best regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
