Never mind, Gmail is confusing me... there is indeed "v4" in the subject :)
O.M. 2017-04-01 17:19 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Mosnáček <omosna...@gmail.com>: > Oops, sorry, wrong prefix... > > 2017-04-01 17:17 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Mosnacek <omosna...@gmail.com>: >> The gf128mul_x_ble function is currently defined in gf128mul.c, because >> it depends on the gf128mul_table_be multiplication table. >> >> However, since the function is very small and only uses two values from >> the table, it is better for it to be defined as inline function in >> gf128mul.h. That way, the function can be inlined by the compiler for >> better performance. >> >> For consistency, the other gf128mul_x_* functions are also moved to the >> header file. In addition, the code is rewritten to be constant-time. >> >> After this change, the speed of the generic 'xts(aes)' implementation >> increased from ~225 MiB/s to ~235 MiB/s (measured using 'cryptsetup >> benchmark -c aes-xts-plain64' on an Intel system with CRYPTO_AES_X86_64 >> and CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL disabled). >> >> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosna...@gmail.com> >> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com> >> --- >> v3 -> v4: a faster version of gf128mul_x_lle >> v2 -> v3: constant-time implementation >> v1 -> v2: move all _x_ functions to the header, not just gf128mul_x_ble >> >> crypto/gf128mul.c | 33 +--------------------------- >> include/crypto/gf128mul.h | 55 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/crypto/gf128mul.c b/crypto/gf128mul.c >> index 04facc0..dc01212 100644 >> --- a/crypto/gf128mul.c >> +++ b/crypto/gf128mul.c >> @@ -130,43 +130,12 @@ static const u16 gf128mul_table_le[256] = >> gf128mul_dat(xda_le); >> static const u16 gf128mul_table_be[256] = gf128mul_dat(xda_be); >> >> /* >> - * The following functions multiply a field element by x or by x^8 in >> + * The following functions multiply a field element by x^8 in >> * the polynomial field representation. They use 64-bit word operations >> * to gain speed but compensate for machine endianness and hence work >> * correctly on both styles of machine. >> */ >> >> -static void gf128mul_x_lle(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> -{ >> - u64 a = be64_to_cpu(x->a); >> - u64 b = be64_to_cpu(x->b); >> - u64 _tt = gf128mul_table_le[(b << 7) & 0xff]; >> - >> - r->b = cpu_to_be64((b >> 1) | (a << 63)); >> - r->a = cpu_to_be64((a >> 1) ^ (_tt << 48)); >> -} >> - >> -static void gf128mul_x_bbe(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> -{ >> - u64 a = be64_to_cpu(x->a); >> - u64 b = be64_to_cpu(x->b); >> - u64 _tt = gf128mul_table_be[a >> 63]; >> - >> - r->a = cpu_to_be64((a << 1) | (b >> 63)); >> - r->b = cpu_to_be64((b << 1) ^ _tt); >> -} >> - >> -void gf128mul_x_ble(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> -{ >> - u64 a = le64_to_cpu(x->a); >> - u64 b = le64_to_cpu(x->b); >> - u64 _tt = gf128mul_table_be[b >> 63]; >> - >> - r->a = cpu_to_le64((a << 1) ^ _tt); >> - r->b = cpu_to_le64((b << 1) | (a >> 63)); >> -} >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(gf128mul_x_ble); >> - >> static void gf128mul_x8_lle(be128 *x) >> { >> u64 a = be64_to_cpu(x->a); >> diff --git a/include/crypto/gf128mul.h b/include/crypto/gf128mul.h >> index 0bc9b5f..35ced9d 100644 >> --- a/include/crypto/gf128mul.h >> +++ b/include/crypto/gf128mul.h >> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ >> #ifndef _CRYPTO_GF128MUL_H >> #define _CRYPTO_GF128MUL_H >> >> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> >> #include <crypto/b128ops.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> >> @@ -163,8 +164,58 @@ void gf128mul_lle(be128 *a, const be128 *b); >> >> void gf128mul_bbe(be128 *a, const be128 *b); >> >> -/* multiply by x in ble format, needed by XTS */ >> -void gf128mul_x_ble(be128 *a, const be128 *b); >> +/* >> + * The following functions multiply a field element by x in >> + * the polynomial field representation. They use 64-bit word operations >> + * to gain speed but compensate for machine endianness and hence work >> + * correctly on both styles of machine. >> + * >> + * They are defined here for performance. >> + */ >> + >> +static inline u64 gf128mul_mask_from_bit(u64 x, int which) >> +{ >> + /* a constant-time version of 'x & ((u64)1 << which) ? (u64)-1 : 0' >> */ >> + return ((s64)(x << (63 - which)) >> 63); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void gf128mul_x_lle(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> +{ >> + u64 a = be64_to_cpu(x->a); >> + u64 b = be64_to_cpu(x->b); >> + >> + /* equivalent to gf128mul_table_le[(b << 7) & 0xff] << 48 >> + * (see crypto/gf128mul.c): */ >> + u64 _tt = gf128mul_mask_from_bit(b, 0) & ((u64)0xe1 << 56); >> + >> + r->b = cpu_to_be64((b >> 1) | (a << 63)); >> + r->a = cpu_to_be64((a >> 1) ^ _tt); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void gf128mul_x_bbe(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> +{ >> + u64 a = be64_to_cpu(x->a); >> + u64 b = be64_to_cpu(x->b); >> + >> + /* equivalent to gf128mul_table_be[a >> 63] (see crypto/gf128mul.c): >> */ >> + u64 _tt = gf128mul_mask_from_bit(a, 63) & 0x87; >> + >> + r->a = cpu_to_be64((a << 1) | (b >> 63)); >> + r->b = cpu_to_be64((b << 1) ^ _tt); >> +} >> + >> +/* needed by XTS */ >> +static inline void gf128mul_x_ble(be128 *r, const be128 *x) >> +{ >> + u64 a = le64_to_cpu(x->a); >> + u64 b = le64_to_cpu(x->b); >> + >> + /* equivalent to gf128mul_table_be[b >> 63] (see crypto/gf128mul.c): >> */ >> + u64 _tt = gf128mul_mask_from_bit(b, 63) & 0x87; >> + >> + r->a = cpu_to_le64((a << 1) ^ _tt); >> + r->b = cpu_to_le64((b << 1) | (a >> 63)); >> +} >> >> /* 4k table optimization */ >> >> -- >> 2.9.3 >>