Hi Antoine,
 
 On mer., mai 24 2017, Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The EIP197 cryptographic engine supports 64 bits address width but is
> limited to 40 bits on 7k/8k. Add a dma-mask property in the
> cryptographic engine nodes to reflect this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com>

Applied on mvebu/dt64

Thanks,

Gregory

> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi  | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi
> index b4bc42ece754..434d8a806ffa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi
> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@
>                               interrupt-names = "mem", "ring0", "ring1",
>                               "ring2", "ring3", "eip";
>                               clocks = <&cpm_syscon0 1 26>;
> +                             dma-mask = <0xff 0xffffffff>;
>                               status = "disabled";
>                       };
>               };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi
> index 6e2058847ddc..17ca94a5d6b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@
>                               interrupt-names = "mem", "ring0", "ring1",
>                                                 "ring2", "ring3", "eip";
>                               clocks = <&cps_syscon0 1 26>;
> +                             dma-mask = <0xff 0xffffffff>;
>                               status = "disabled";
>                       };
>               };
> -- 
> 2.9.4
>

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to