On 26/09/17 15:34, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 03:22:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index 6784a05dd6b2..d7f7def81613 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -2254,10 +2254,12 @@ static int __domain_mapping(struct dmar_domain
>> *domain, unsigned long iov_pfn,
>> uint64_t tmp;
>>
>> if (!sg_res) {
>> + size_t off = sg->offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
>
> Should this be VTD_PAGE_MASK?
PAGE_MASK (and the corresponding pteval arithmetic) was intentional
here; given the way aligned_nrpages() works, the IOVA space allocated in
intel_map_sg() (and thus iov_pfn) is already rounded to full MM pages,
and it seemed like the original intent was to map the whole lot - this
change is just to make that happen correctly.
Whether it's actually reasonable to decouple the IOMMU and CPU page
sizes entirely (as we do in dma-iommu, for example), and not do the
MM-page-alignment thing at all, is another matter that I'm happy to
leave in your hands :)
Robin.
>> +
>> sg_res = aligned_nrpages(sg->offset, sg->length);
>> - sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn <<
>> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + sg->offset;
>> + sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn <<
>> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + off;
>> sg->dma_length = sg->length;
>> - pteval = page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) | prot;
>> + pteval = (page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset - off)
>> | prot;
>
> Something seems wrong here.. sg->offset can be > VTD_PAGE_SIZE, think
> we should add sg->offset and then find the pteval?
>
> attached below another cut at fixing the same problem.. if there is something
> obvious i missed, let me know.
>
> again.. untested :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Ashok
>
