On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:37:44AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 02:29:42PM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > [+Cc Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>]
> > 
> > 
> > I was able to reproduce this by trying to use 'pcrypt' recursively.  I am 
> > not
> > 100% sure it is the exact same bug, but it probably is.  Here is a C 
> > reproducer:
> > 
> >     #include <linux/if_alg.h>
> >     #include <sys/socket.h>
> >     #include <unistd.h>
> > 
> >     int main()
> >     {
> >             struct sockaddr_alg addr = {
> >                     .salg_type = "aead",
> >                     .salg_name = "pcrypt(pcrypt(rfc4106-gcm-aesni))",
> >             };
> >             int algfd, reqfd;
> >             char buf[32] = { 0 };
> > 
> >             algfd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> >             bind(algfd, (void *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> >             setsockopt(algfd, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, buf, 20);
> > 
> >             reqfd = accept(algfd, 0, 0);
> >             write(reqfd, buf, 32);
> >             read(reqfd, buf, 16);
> >     }
> > 
> > It seems the problem is that all 'pcrypt' instances use the same
> > 'padata_instance', which completes works in the order they are submitted.  
> > But
> > with nested use, the outer work is submitted before the inner work, so the 
> > inner
> > work isn't allowed to complete until the outer work does, which deadlocks
> > because actually the inner work needs to complete first.
> > 
> > What a mess.  Maybe there should be a separate 'padata_instance' per pcrypt
> > instance?  Or maybe there should be a way for an algorithm to declare that 
> > it
> > can only appear in the stack one time?  
> 
> Having two nested pcrypt templates in one algorithm instance
> does not make so much sense in the first place. I thought
> that the crypto layer would refuse to build an instance
> with two nested templates of the same type.
> 
> At least for pcrypt, refusing such instantiations would
> be the correct behaviour. Are there any other templates
> where a nested use would make sense?

Maybe.  But either way, I don't see a straightforward way to prevent it
currently.  In particular, the links from an instance to its inner algorithms
are stored in the crypto_instance_ctx() which has a template-specific format, so
it isn't currently possible to recursively search an instance to check whether a
particular template is present.  We could perhaps add such links in a standard
format, though...

Eric

Reply via email to