On Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:11:32 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018, 10:33:07 CEST schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > Hi Rafael,
Hi Stephan, > > So the problem is that Yu would like to use this for hibernation encryption > > done entirely in the kernel. > > But why do you need to perform PBKDF in kernel space? > > If you retain the password information in the kernel, you could retain the > derived key instead of the passcode. > > If, however, you ask for the user password during resume, you need some user > space component to query that password. The PBKDF can also be handled in user > space along with the query. In principle it is possible to pass a key to the kernel from user space, but that doesn't guarantee the key to be a really good one. It depends on a user space component to do the right thing and IMO that is risky. And please note that the information contained in hibernation images may be extremely sensitive (keys and similar). > Or how do you want to handle the passcode? The idea is to write a passphrase to the kernel via something like sysfs, generate a key from it on the fly and store the key. > > > > The exact use case is to generate a symmetric encryption key out of a > > passphrase. Is there a recommended way to do that using the algorithms > > already implemented in the kernel? > > For example, dmcrypt uses PBKDF2 for its operation. And this PBKDF is done in > user space by libcryptsetup that utilizes a crypto lib, commonly libgcrypt. I know that. We can do that here too in principle, but I'd prefer all crypto to take place in the kernel in this particular case. Thanks, Rafael
