Hi Joe,
I like the idea. I'll take a look at the cases you mention and see
if I can make them work with your version of swap.
BTW, I wonder if it would be more convenient to trigger a build warning
instead of an error.
What do you think?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 07/18/2018 01:31 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 12:19 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> swap
>
> Perhaps the swap macro should verify that the
> swap(a, b) arguments are the same type.
>
> Something like the patch below, but this patch
> causes a compilation failure on at least a couple
> cases that aren't obviously correct in
>
> net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_port.c
> where a u16 is swapped with a u32.
>
> and
>
> net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_netport.c
> where a single bit bitfield is swapped with a u8
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index d6aac75b51ba..506b59e0da24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -969,14 +969,19 @@ static inline void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode
> oops_dump_mode) { }
> */
> #define clamp_val(val, lo, hi) clamp_t(typeof(val), val, lo, hi)
>
> -
> /**
> * swap - swap values of @a and @b
> * @a: first value
> * @b: second value
> + * @a and @b must be the same type
> */
> -#define swap(a, b) \
> - do { typeof(a) __tmp = (a); (a) = (b); (b) = __tmp; } while (0)
> +#define swap(a, b) \
> +do { \
> + typeof(a) __tmp = (a); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(a), typeof(b))); \
> + (a) = (b); \
> + (b) = __tmp; \
> +} while (0)
>
> /* This counts to 12. Any more, it will return 13th argument. */
> #define __COUNT_ARGS(_0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10, _11, _12,
> _n, X...) _n
>
