On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The skcipher API dynamically instantiates the transformation object on
> request that implements the requested algorithm optimally on the given
> platform. This notion of optimality only matters for cases like bulk
> network or disk encryption, where performance can be a bottleneck, or
> in cases where the algorithm itself is not known at compile time.
> 
> In the mscc macsec case, we are dealing with AES encryption of a single
> block, and so neither concern applies, and we are better off using the
> AES library interface, which is lightweight and safe for this kind of
> use.
> 
> Note that the scatterlist API does not permit references to buffers that
> are located on the stack, so the existing code is incorrect in any case,
> but avoiding the skcipher and scatterlist APIs altogether is the most
> straight-forward approach to fixing this.
> 
> Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@bootlin.com>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 28c5107aa904e ("net: phy: mscc: macsec support")
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/Kconfig            |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_macsec.c | 40 +++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> index f25702386d83..e9c05848ec52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -480,8 +480,7 @@ config MICROCHIP_T1_PHY
>  config MICROSEMI_PHY
>       tristate "Microsemi PHYs"
>       depends on MACSEC || MACSEC=n
> -     select CRYPTO_AES
> -     select CRYPTO_ECB
> +     select CRYPTO_LIB_AES
>       help
>         Currently supports VSC8514, VSC8530, VSC8531, VSC8540 and VSC8541 PHYs

Shouldn't it be 'select CRYPTO_LIB_AES if MACSEC', since
mscc_macsec.c is only compiled if MACSEC?

>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_macsec.c 
> b/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_macsec.c
> index b4d3dc4068e2..d53ca884b5c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_macsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_macsec.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/net/mscc-phy-vsc8531.h>
>  
> -#include <crypto/skcipher.h>
> +#include <crypto/aes.h>
>  
>  #include <net/macsec.h>
>  
> @@ -500,39 +500,17 @@ static u32 vsc8584_macsec_flow_context_id(struct 
> macsec_flow *flow)
>  static int vsc8584_macsec_derive_key(const u8 key[MACSEC_KEYID_LEN],
>                                    u16 key_len, u8 hkey[16])
>  {
> -     struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_alloc_skcipher("ecb(aes)", 0, 0);
> -     struct skcipher_request *req = NULL;
> -     struct scatterlist src, dst;
> -     DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
> -     u32 input[4] = {0};
> +     const u8 input[AES_BLOCK_SIZE] = {0};
> +     struct crypto_aes_ctx ctx;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (IS_ERR(tfm))
> -             return PTR_ERR(tfm);
> -
> -     req = skcipher_request_alloc(tfm, GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!req) {
> -             ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
> -     skcipher_request_set_callback(req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG |
> -                                   CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP, crypto_req_done,
> -                                   &wait);
> -     ret = crypto_skcipher_setkey(tfm, key, key_len);
> -     if (ret < 0)
> -             goto out;
> -
> -     sg_init_one(&src, input, 16);
> -     sg_init_one(&dst, hkey, 16);
> -     skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &src, &dst, 16, NULL);
> -
> -     ret = crypto_wait_req(crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req), &wait);
> +     ret = aes_expandkey(&ctx, key, key_len);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
>  
> -out:
> -     skcipher_request_free(req);
> -     crypto_free_skcipher(tfm);
> -     return ret;
> +     aes_encrypt(&ctx, hkey, input);
> +     memzero_explicit(&ctx, sizeof(ctx));
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  

Otherwise this looks good.  You can add:

        Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>

- Eric

Reply via email to