Under FIPS mode, the hkdf test fails because salt is required
to be at least 32 bytes long. Pad salt with 0's.

Signed-off-by: Li Tian <[email protected]>
---
 crypto/hkdf.c         | 11 ++++++++++-
 fs/crypto/hkdf.c      | 13 -------------
 include/crypto/hkdf.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/hkdf.c b/crypto/hkdf.c
index 82d1b32ca6ce..9af0ef4dfb35 100644
--- a/crypto/hkdf.c
+++ b/crypto/hkdf.c
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ int hkdf_extract(struct crypto_shash *hmac_tfm, const u8 
*ikm,
                 u8 *prk)
 {
        int err;
+       u8 tmp_salt[HKDF_HASHLEN];
+
+       if (saltlen < HKDF_HASHLEN) {
+               /* Copy salt and pad with zeros to HashLen */
+               memcpy(tmp_salt, salt, saltlen);
+               memset(tmp_salt + saltlen, 0, HKDF_HASHLEN - saltlen);
+               salt = tmp_salt;
+               saltlen = HKDF_HASHLEN;
+       }
 
        err = crypto_shash_setkey(hmac_tfm, salt, saltlen);
        if (!err)
@@ -151,7 +160,7 @@ struct hkdf_testvec {
  */
 static const struct hkdf_testvec hkdf_sha256_tv[] = {
        {
-               .test = "basic hdkf test",
+               .test = "basic hkdf test",
                .ikm  = 
"\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b"
                        "\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b\x0b",
                .ikm_size = 22,
diff --git a/fs/crypto/hkdf.c b/fs/crypto/hkdf.c
index 706f56d0076e..5e4844c1d3d7 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/hkdf.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/hkdf.c
@@ -13,19 +13,6 @@
 
 #include "fscrypt_private.h"
 
-/*
- * HKDF supports any unkeyed cryptographic hash algorithm, but fscrypt uses
- * SHA-512 because it is well-established, secure, and reasonably efficient.
- *
- * HKDF-SHA256 was also considered, as its 256-bit security strength would be
- * sufficient here.  A 512-bit security strength is "nice to have", though.
- * Also, on 64-bit CPUs, SHA-512 is usually just as fast as SHA-256.  In the
- * common case of deriving an AES-256-XTS key (512 bits), that can result in
- * HKDF-SHA512 being much faster than HKDF-SHA256, as the longer digest size of
- * SHA-512 causes HKDF-Expand to only need to do one iteration rather than two.
- */
-#define HKDF_HASHLEN           SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE
-
 /*
  * HKDF consists of two steps:
  *
diff --git a/include/crypto/hkdf.h b/include/crypto/hkdf.h
index 6a9678f508f5..7ef55ce875e2 100644
--- a/include/crypto/hkdf.h
+++ b/include/crypto/hkdf.h
@@ -11,6 +11,19 @@
 
 #include <crypto/hash.h>
 
+/*
+ * HKDF supports any unkeyed cryptographic hash algorithm, but fscrypt uses
+ * SHA-512 because it is well-established, secure, and reasonably efficient.
+ *
+ * HKDF-SHA256 was also considered, as its 256-bit security strength would be
+ * sufficient here.  A 512-bit security strength is "nice to have", though.
+ * Also, on 64-bit CPUs, SHA-512 is usually just as fast as SHA-256.  In the
+ * common case of deriving an AES-256-XTS key (512 bits), that can result in
+ * HKDF-SHA512 being much faster than HKDF-SHA256, as the longer digest size of
+ * SHA-512 causes HKDF-Expand to only need to do one iteration rather than two.
+ */
+#define HKDF_HASHLEN            SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE
+
 int hkdf_extract(struct crypto_shash *hmac_tfm, const u8 *ikm,
                 unsigned int ikmlen, const u8 *salt, unsigned int saltlen,
                 u8 *prk);
-- 
2.50.0


Reply via email to