Hi,
>>"Shaw" == Shaw Carruthers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shaw> The purpose of the patch is to make diald work with kernels
Shaw> 2.1.9x, the unpatched diald works with 2.0.x kernels. So that is
Shaw> to be expected. The functionality of the Linux sockets changed
Shaw> from 2.0 to 2.1, so the same code will not work on both kernels
Thanks for clarifying that. I just test uname -r before
starting diald, and start the correct binary as needed. Thanks
again.
______________________________________________________________________
KVERSION=$(uname -r)
case "$KVERSION" in
2.0.*) DIALD=/usr/sbin/diald.stable;
;;
*) DIALD=/usr/sbin/diald;
;;
esac
______________________________________________________________________
I am getting the following error in syserror, but they do not
seem to affect anything -- just though you may like to know.
manoj
May 2 01:28:30 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add 127.0.0.2 metric 1 dev sl0'
May 2 01:28:30 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add default metric 1 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev sl0'
May 2 02:02:34 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add 127.0.0.2 metric 1 dev sl0'
May 2 02:02:34 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add default metric 1 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev sl0'
May 2 02:05:12 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add 127.0.0.2 metric 1 dev sl0'
May 2 02:05:12 tiamat diald[241]: Nonzero exit status (7) on command '/sbin/rou
te add default metric 1 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev sl0'
--
"I have two very rare photographs: one is a picture of Houdini
locking his keys in his car; the other is a rare photograph of Norman
Rockwell beating up a child." Steven Wright
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]