On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Martin J. Maney wrote:

> 
> On 3 Aug 1998, Jake Colman wrote:
> > Hmmm.  I though that the diald FAQ says that you should NOT run named!  I had
> > had a chaching name server set up (using the default caching name server RPM
> > included with RH 5.1) but removed it because of the FAQ.  I am I
> > misremembering (is that a word?) something?
> 
> The problem, as best I recall, is that with a caching server the initial
> request may try to establish a connection (TCP) rather than being a
> datagram (UDP) DNS request.  This can cause problems especially with a
> link that has a dynamic IP address - that initial TCP session is doomed,
> since it has an incorrect source IP address.  I believe there's a kernel
> hack that attempts to deal with this, but from what I've read it is less
> than perfect.  As I think I said, I'm lucky enough to have a fixed IP
> address, so my knowledge of dealing with dynamic addresses is secondhand
> and theoretical.

My dynamic setup is working well.  
I'm using Samba/diald/ipfw/dynamic IP/named/kernel 2.0.35 / 2 computer
network w/win95.  If you would like an overview of my configuration, take
a peek at: http://www.people.virginia.edu/~drf5n/extras/linux_net

I leave bind/named up all the time, counter to the DNS-HOWTO, and haven't
used any ppp-up/down scripts.

I really like the dynamic kernel switch, although I don't have much
documentation on it.  Try:
   grep '' /proc/sys/net/ipv4/*
to see your kernel network settings, and
   echo 1> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
to turn on the dynamic address/packet re-writing.  I mostly connect on the
first try.

Dave

> 
> > In any case, what version of named or bind are you using?  How do you have it
> > set up?  Can you point me to a FAQ?  My network is quite small.  A Linux box
> > running Samba, diald, and with ability to connnect to ISP via PPP, and
> > several Win95 boxes.  I use IP Masq to successfully masquerade the network
> > over PPP, and use Samba to publish Linux-based mounts and to access Win-based
> > mounts.
> 
> That's very like the home/office network here.  I'm using whichever
> version of bind shipped with Debian 1.3.  There's a pretty good HOWTO for
> bind/DNS, but the syntax, especially for the very important reverse (IP to
> FQDN) tables is hard to get right.  It's not so much inherently hairy, I
> think, as just consistently backwards: I didn't find it easy to keep
> things wrong-way-around.  :-)
> 
> > I'll look at this solution but I think that is already the case.
> 
> One gotcha I've seen mentioned about hosts is that the first name really
> needs to be the fully-qualified name; aliases follow that.  Aside from
> that and typos, no problem!
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

 .................................................................
 Dave Forrest                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (804)-979-8634               http://watt.seas.virginia.edu/~drf5n


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to