On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Mike Jagdis wrote: > There isn't necessarily anything inherently wrong with having > multiple dialds starting with the same conf file. Perhaps diald should generate a warning if it looks like it's going to overwrite the pidfile of an already running diald. -- Ed Doolittle <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Everything we do, we do for a reason." -- Peter O'Chiese - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: diald not starting at boot Lourdes Jones
- Re: diald not starting at boot dizzy
- Re: diald not starting at boot Ed Doolittle
- RE: diald not starting at boot Lourdes Jones
- RE: diald not starting at boot Ed Doolittle
- Re: diald not starting at boot Mike Jagdis
- Re: diald not starting at boot dizzy
- Re: diald not starting at boot Ed Doolittle
- Re: diald not starting at boot Ed Doolittle
- Re: diald not starting at boot Mike Jagdis
- Re: diald not starting at boot Ed Doolittle
- Re: diald not starting at boot Giulio Orsero
