On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 09:31:57AM -0500, Jeffrey P. Rudnick wrote:
> Thanks, I appreciate all suggestions. My linux server is assigned a static
> class 1 address (10.1.1.1) as are the other machines on my LAN (10.2.2.2
> etc, when they are turned on). However, I am using dynamic address
> allocation when connecting to my ISP on linux.
>
> In my diald.conf I am using my real local IP address for 'local' (10.1.1.1)
> and a fictional class 1 address (10.0.0.2) for 'remote'.
Don't use your real local IP address, use some other IP address.
On my network I have set aside two IP addresses just for this purpose.
While the kernel will accept the same IP address for multiple
interfaces, it is bound to break something.
snipped ifconfig output. I note in passing that you have an 80-99%
error rate on all interfaces.
> > Aug 24 20:44:51 redhat1 diald[1183]: filter accepted rule 1
> > proto17 len 160
> > packet 207.208.139.10,513 => 10.255.255.255,513
> >
> > Regrettably, I don't know if this message is applicable. Or should I be
This message is symptomatic of the double IP assigment. Diald is
intercepting local packets on sl0 becuase sl0 has the same IP as eth0.
Not good.
--
Gyepi Sam --+-- Designer/Programmer --+-- Network/System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --+-- http://www.praxis-sw.com/gyepi
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits. -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
