On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Uncle Meat wrote:
> > I was a happy user of diald-16.5a under 2.0.36, but now I lost my
> > harddrive
> > and it gives me incentive to move to RH6.0 and diald-0.99.1
> > (I got the impression that diald-16.5a has some troubles with 2.2
> > kernels,
> > like dying unexpectedly, am I right ?).
>
> Others may have had this problem. I have yet to have it happen to me,
> sometimes running over 3 weeks without rebooting without it dying.
>
> Used it with the original 2.2.5-whatever, and have upgraded several
> times to 2.2.11 now.
I'll second that. I'm using 0.16-5a on a 2.2.9 kernel and have had it up
for 73 days now without a problem. Trying to upgrade to 0.99.1 broke a few
custom things, so it's been a back-burner project for some time now...
- Dale -
__ _
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
