hi

I had similar problems with the kernel routin table using diald 0.99.1.
I attempted with a lot of combinations but the solution finally were,
upgrade diald to the lastest version 0.99.4
You cand find this software at fresmeast http://fresmeat.net

Mauricio Alvarez
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Thomas Michalka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Mailingliste, Linux-Diald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Domingo, 19 de Marzo de 2000 10:55 p.m.
Asunto: No Substitution of Default Route


>Dear Diald friends,
>
>I'm using version 0.99.1 which seems to have rather strange problems that I
never had
>with version 0.16.5 before.
>
>Until today the 0.99.1 never substituted the SLIP device sl0 with ppp0 when
pppd was
>invoked (output of 'route' and 'ifconfig' contained no ppp0 but sl0).
>
>Now, without doing anything at all, diald substitutes the route through sl0
>by a route through ppp0 to the remote ip number.
>
>But I still can't get a bit over the established connection. This is
because diald
>doesn't substitute the default route over sl0 by a default route over ppp0
(adding
>one manually helps) but I think diald should do this by default. Am I wrong
with this?
>(BTW: diald 0.99.1 doesn't understand the (default) option 'reroute'
although it's
>described in the man page.)
>
>I would really like to understand this strange behaviour so it would be
very much
>appreciated if somebody could point me to its reason and perhaps show me a
way out
>of this.
>
>Regards
>Tom
>
>P.S.: If installing the 0.99.4 is the best way, where can I get a binary
package (rpm)?
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to