Hi, * Phil Muldoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-01 05:08]: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > honest, I prefer updates sites to RPMs as it more the "Eclipse" way > (imo). I wonder if these is a way to mesh them together?
We're never going to avoid either method of installation. There are potential points of integration with p2 and PackageKit. >> 2. Have an actual release! Then we won't be the bad Eclipse project who >> never really followed the processes :) > > A Linux tools based release separate from the distribution releases > would be neat. Then we could follow a feature path instead of a Fedora 9 > or Ubuntu release path. The big drawback with distribution release paths > is the functionality of the different Eclipse Linux Tools is not > consistent across distributions. Do you mean the specfile editor vs. the lack of a .deb/whatever editor? > Thanks for asking, and starting the conversation! Thanks for participating, Phil! Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-distros-dev mailing list linux-distros-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-distros-dev
