On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:34:02PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> +static int uio_dmem_genirq_alloc_platdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct uio_dmem_genirq_pdata pdata;
> +     u32 dma_bits, regions;
> +     u32 sizes[MAX_UIO_MAPS];
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     memset(&pdata, 0, sizeof(pdata));
> +
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> +                                uio_of_dma_bits_prop, &dma_bits);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +                     "Missing property %s\n", uio_of_dma_bits_prop);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +     if (dma_bits > 64)
> +             dma_bits = 64;
> +
> +     dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits));

You really need to check the return value from this: this function
negotiates with the architecture, and if 64-bit DMA is not supported,
then the call will fail and you as a driver are expected to fall back
to 32-bit DMA only.

In that case, you're expected to call the same function with a 32-bit
mask, and if that fails, you're supposed to then decide that DMA is
not possible.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to