On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:12:41 +0200
Markus Heiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> this series is a consolidation on Jon's docs-next branch. It merges the
> "sphinx
> sub-folders" patch [1] and the "parseheaders directive" patch [2] on top of
> Jon's docs-next.
>
> In sense of consolidation, it also includes:
>
> * doc-rst: add media/conf_nitpick.py
>
> Adds media/conf_nitpick.py from mchehab/docs-next [3].
>
> * doc-rst: migrated media build to parseheaders directive
OK, I have applied the first five of these, but stopped at parse-header.
At this point, I have a few requests. These are in approximate order of
decreasing importance, but they're all important, I think.
- The new directive could really use some ... documentation. Preferably in
kernel-documentation.rst with the rest. What is parse-header, how does
it differ from kernel-doc, why might a kernel developer doing
documentation want (or not want) to use it? That's all pretty obscure
now. If we want others to jump onto this little bandwagon of ours, we
need to make sure it's all really clear.
- Along those lines, is parse-header the right name for this thing?
"Parsing" isn't necessarily the goal of somebody who uses this directive,
right? They want to extract documentation information. Can we come up
with a better name?
- Can we please try to get the coding style a bit more in line with both
kernel and Python community norms? I suspect some people will get grumpy
if they see this code. In particular:
- Please try to stick to the 80-column limit when possible. Python
makes that a bit harder than C does, and please don't put in
ridiculous line breaks that make the code worse. But sticking a bit
closer to the rule would be good.
- The "#========================" lines around function/class
definition lines or other comments are not helpful, please avoid
them. Instead, placing a real comment with actual informative text
above the function/class would be a good thing. (I could live with
Python docstrings if you prefer, though I will confess I prefer
ordinary comments).
- No commas at the beginning of continuation lines, please; that would
get you yelled at in C code. If you need to break a function call
(or whatever), please put the commas at the end of the line as is
done elsewhere.
Sorry to poke at nits here, but we want others in the kernel community to
be able to look at this code, and that will be easier if we stick closer
to the usual rules.
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
