>>> A common type of bug to be aware of is "one err bugs" which look like this: >>> >>> - err: >>> + err: >>> kfree(foo->bar); >>> kfree(foo); >>> return ret; >>> >>> The bug in this code is that on some exit paths "foo" is NULL. Normally >>> the >> >> ...except that kfree() can handle null pointers just fine, so this isn't >> actually a bug, right? Someday when somebody has time it would be good to >> come up with a better example. > > But if foo is NULL,
An important condition … > foo->bar is not NULL I wonder about this information. Which run-time environment will provide this behaviour? > and so kfree will have a problem with it. I find that the parameter evaluation will result in side effects (because of a null pointer access) which are usually unwanted. So the execution of this function call will eventually not start. > So this is a bug. How do you think about further software development possibilities to improve corresponding exception handling? How much can the selection of jump labels influence the software design? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
