On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > echo 1 >/proc/irq/9/trigger >> > (or the corresponding /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/ interface if we want to >> > make sure that this >> > is really not for production use...). >> >> or /sys/kernel/irq as a successor of /proc/irq > > /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/ is already there and it's DEBUG and not > something which is in the regular sysfs maze. Yep. My point was "not to extend /proc/irq interface". From the description of the series it indeed looks suitable rather for debug. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
