On Friday, October 13, 2017 8:48:30 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 October 2017 at 02:33, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > Fix kerneldoc comments of __device_suspend_noirq(), > > __device_suspend_late() and __device_suspend() where the function > > names in kerneldoc don't match the actual names of the functions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c > > @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static pm_message_t resume_event(pm_mess > > } > > > > /** > > - * device_suspend_noirq - Execute a "late suspend" callback for given > > device. > > + * __device_suspend_noirq - Execute a "late suspend" callback for given > > device. > > While at it, I suggest to also change "late suspend" to "noirq suspend". > > As a matter of fact I found the similar text to be wrong also for > device_resume_noirq(), perhaps that should be fixed as well.
Right, I will do that. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html