On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:00:05AM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
SNIP
> +
> +static int intel_bm_event_nmi_handler(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + union bm_detect_status stat;
> + struct perf_sample_data data;
> + int i;
> + unsigned long x;
> +
> + rdmsrl(BR_DETECT_STATUS_MSR, stat.raw);
> +
> + if (stat.event) {
> + wrmsrl(BR_DETECT_STATUS_MSR, 0);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + /*
> + * Issue wake-up to corrresponding polling event
> + */
> + x = stat.ctrl_hit;
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &x, bm_num_counters) {
> + event = bm_counter_owner[i];
> + perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
> + perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs);
hum, it's non sampling events only right? then you don't need
any of the perf_sample_data stuff.. the perf_event_overflow call
is basicaly nop
> + local64_inc(&event->count);
> + atomic_set(&event->hw.bm_poll, POLLIN);
> + event->pending_wakeup = 1;
> + irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
also this is for sampling events only
seems like you only want to increment the event->count in here
thanks,
jirka
> + }
> + return NMI_HANDLED;
> + }
> + return NMI_DONE;
> +}
SNIP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
