Hello maintainers, I wanted to ask if this patch of mine is accepted as of now.
Thank you Attreyee Mukherjee On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 at 10:22, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 03:08:54PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > attreyee-muk <tintinm2...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Update the sentence in livepatch.rst to: "Functions are there for a > > > reason. Take some input parameters, acquire or release locks, read, > > > process, and write some data in a defined way." > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > So this is a classic example of saying what you have done, but not why. > > What makes this a change that we want? > > I think what he intended was "The word 'get' is not the correct antonym to > 'release' in the context of locking. Replace it with 'acquire'". > > Thanks. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
