On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/04/2024 15:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The recommendation is based on the following rationale: > > > > - it makes the commit messages much cleaner and easy to read, especially > > on the screens of the mobile devices; > > > > - it reduces resources (memory, time, energy) to retrieve all these > > headers, which are barely needed by a mere user, as for automation > > they will be still available via mail archives, such as > > https://lore.kernel.org, assuming the Link: or Message-ID tag is > > provided. > > > > Let's be environment friendly and save the planet!
... > > +It's recommended to locate the additional Cc: tags after the cutter '---' > > line > > +in the patches as it makes sure the commit message won't be polluted with > > them. > > +At the same time they will be available via email headers on the mail > > archives, > > +such as https://lore.kernel.org. > > Manually added useful Cc-tags should be kept in commit msg, because it > annotates who could be interested in the patch. > > The problem is that people put output of get_maintainers.pl as Cc to the > commit list. This is 100% redundant because it can be recreated any > given time with 100% accuracy (for given kernel tree). Therefore I would > propose to rephrase it to something: > > ==== > It is recommended to not add autogenerated scripts/get_maintainer.pl > CC-entries into the commit msg, but keep them under cutter '---'. There > is no single need to store automated output of get_maintainers.pl in the > git log. It can be easily re-created at any given time, thus its > presence in the git history is redundant and obfuscates the log. Right, but still even for non-automated output it might (may) be redundant, however I can go for this compromise as most of the Cc indeed duplicate the output of get_maintainer.pl. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
