On 6/22/24 7:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> I see some existing usage of the above style, but equally there's lots >> of examples of footnote-style links without the Link: tag, eg: > I moved from that to using Link: because checkpatch would complain about my > long (URL) lines unless it had a Link tag :P We know that checkpatch isn't perfect. It's safe to ignore such complaints. -- ~Randy
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best practices... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best pract... Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best p... Jonathan Corbet
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: be... Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentatio... Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Document... Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Document... Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Document... Steven Rostedt
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best practices... Michael Ellerman
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best pract... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best p... Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Documentation: update information ... Carlos Bilbao
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Documentation: update information ... Steven Rostedt
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Documentation: update information ... Jonathan Corbet