On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 07:49:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > +Open development > +---------------- > + > +Discussions about user reported issues, and development of new code > +should be conducted in a manner typical for the larger subsystem. > +It is common for development within a single company to be conducted > +behind closed doors. However, maintainers must not redirect discussions > +and development related to the upstream code from the upstream mailing lists > +to closed forums or private conversations. Reasonable exceptions to this > +guidance include discussions about security related issues.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> I do think it's fine for people to have open places like github as an option as well, so long as they're optional for contributors and things pass through the lists in a normal fashion at some point. Directing people towards existing relevant discussions/reviews can work well. The main issues are taking things out of all visibility and blocking contributors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
