Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> writes: > Patches for SoCs are expected to be picked up by SoC submaintainers. > The main SoC maintainers should be addressed only in few cases. > > Rewrite the section about maintainer handling to document above > expectation. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > Cc: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> > Cc: Heiko Stübner <[email protected]> > > --- > > During our LPC ad-hoc BoF, we discussed improving Maintainer SoC docs > and I think I volunteered to write something. The trouble is that > whatever I won't write in my notes, escapes my memory. > > I believe this is what we discussed. Was there anything more to > write/document? > > Changes in v2: > 1. Fix missing closing ) (Conor). > 2. Style changes (in point 3.). > 3. Soften note that soc@kernel is not for discussing ("is usually not"). > --- > Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks. jon
