On May 22, 2025 10:24:30 PM PDT, Andrew Donnellan <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 21:39 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless >> the __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for >> __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to >> handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved. >> For >> s390 this requires forcing a couple functions to be inline with > >I assume you mean powerpc here, though I'm sure my employer is happy >that you're at least confusing us with IBM's other architecture :) Whoops! Yes. Paste-o on my part. The rest of the sentence was updated correctly though. :) -- Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 00/14] stackleak: Support Clang stack depth tra... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 01/14] stackleak: Rename STACKLEAK to KSTA... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 02/14] stackleak: Rename stackleak_track_s... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 03/14] stackleak: Split KSTACK_ERASE_CFLAG... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 11/14] init.h: Disable sanitizer coverage ... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init vs inli... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init... Andrew Donnellan
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init... IBM
- [PATCH v2 12/14] kstack_erase: Support Clang stack d... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 13/14] configs/hardening: Enable CONFIG_KS... Kees Cook
- [PATCH v2 07/14] s390: Handle KCOV __init vs inline ... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] s390: Handle KCOV __init vs... Heiko Carstens
- [PATCH v2 10/14] loongarch: Handle KCOV __init vs in... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] loongarch: Handle KCOV __in... Huacai Chen
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] loongarch: Handle KCOV ... Huacai Chen
