On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 04:50:19PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 09:42:46AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > Extend the example to show how to run a userspace executable. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weisssc...@linutronix.de> > > > > --- > > > > lib/kunit/.kunitconfig | 2 ++ > > > > lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 ++++++++- > > > > lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > > > lib/kunit/kunit-example-uapi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > Adding this diff allows 'make clean' to clean up the UAPI test binary: > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile > > > --- a/lib/Makefile > > > +++ b/lib/Makefile > > > @@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_test_fpu_impl.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) > > > # Some KUnit files (hooks.o) need to be built-in even when KUnit is a > > > module, > > > # so we can't just use obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT). > > > -ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT > > > -obj-y += kunit/ > > > -endif > > > +obj-$(if $(CONFIG_KUNIT),y) += kunit/ > > > > Wouldn't the following be sufficient? > > > > obj-y += kunit/ > > > > The the kunit Makefile doesn't do anything if CONFIG_KUNIT=y and AFAIK for > > directories obj-m and obj-y should do the same. > > that's wrong. In lib/kunit/Makefile there is > > obj-y += hooks.o > > thus, lib/kunit/hooks.o would then be built unconditionally (even w/o > CONFIG_KUNIT).
Indeed, thanks for the hint. > Iff we would add 'obj-y += kunit/' in lib/Makefile we'd have to adjust the > hooks.o line in lib/kunit/Makefile appropriately. I'll go with the 'obj-y += kunit/' solution for now. It keeps the special logic for hook.o in a single place, gets rid of a duplicate comment and is easier to understand. <snip>
