On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 01:46:47PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > Similarily the argument around not trusting the code is equivalent to > not trusting the person who sent the code in. AI doesn't send patches on > it's own - humans do. This is basically saying "I didn't even look at > your patch because I don't trust you".
One name: Markus Elfring. Ever tried to reason with that one? Or Hillf Danton, for that matter. And I absolutely will refuse to take patches from somebody who would consistently fail to explain why the patch is correct and needed. Sasha, this is the elephant in the room: we *ALREADY* get "contributions" that very clearly stem from "$TOOL says so, what else do you need?" kind of reasoning and some of that dreck ends up in the tree. AI will serve as a force multiplier for those... persons.
