> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 2:24 PM
> To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) 
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 08/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN needs to know 
> delivered bytes
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> information.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:39 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
> >
> > AccECN byte counter estimation requires delivered bytes which can be 
> > calculated while processing SACK blocks and cumulative ACK. The 
> > delivered bytes will be used to estimate the byte counters between 
> > AccECN option (on ACKs w/o the option).
> >
> > Non-SACK calculation is quite annoying, inaccurate, and likely bogus.
> 
> Does it mean AccECN depends on SACK ?
> 

In fact, AccECN does not depend on SACK to function; however, it would be more 
accurate if SACK were there.
In order to avoid confusion, I will remove this old comment in the next version.

Chia-Yu

Reply via email to