On 9/3/25 2:45 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 1:38 PM Tom Hromatka <[email protected]> wrote:+ + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + if (atomic_read(&task->seccomp.filter_count) == 0) { + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);did you copy this pattern from somewhere ? It's obviously buggy.
I tried to mimic the logic in copy_seccomp() in kernel/fork.c, but as you point out, I probably messed it up :). Do you have recommendations for a better design pattern? Thanks! Tom
