On 9/14/25 04:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 9/12/25 6:51 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
-The kernel developers use a loosely time-based release process, with a new
-major kernel release happening every two or three months.  The recent
-release history looks like this:
+Linux kernel uses a loosely time-based, rolling release development model.

    The Linux kernel

+A new major kernel release (a.x) [1]_ happens every two or three monts, which

I'm much more used to x.y                                           months,


The reason I use a.x is because a is indeed supermajor (only incremented on occasional cases i.e. in Linux kernel when x gets large enough), and
x is already used as second placeholder component.

+comes with new features, internal API changes, and more. A typical release
+can contain about 13,000 changesets with changes to several hundred thousand
+lines of code. Recent releases, along with their dates, can be found at
+`Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_version_history>`_.
- ====== =================
-       5.0     March 3, 2019
-       5.1     May 5, 2019
-       5.2     July 7, 2019
-       5.3     September 15, 2019
-       5.4     November 24, 2019
-       5.5     January 6, 2020
-       ======  =================
-
-Every 5.x release is a major kernel release with new features, internal
-API changes, and more.  A typical release can contain about 13,000
-changesets with changes to several hundred thousand lines of code.  5.x is
-the leading edge of Linux kernel development; the kernel uses a
-rolling development model which is continually integrating major changes.
+.. [1] Strictly speaking, Linux kernel do not use semantic versioning

                              the Linux kernel does not

+       number scheme, but rather a.x pair identifies major release

x.y ?
m.n ?
                              rather the a.x


See my above reply.

+       version as a whole number. For each release, x is incremented,
+       but a is incremented only if x is deemed large enough (e.g.
+       Linux 5.0 is released following Linux 4.20).
A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the
  merging of patches for each release.  At the beginning of each development
@@ -48,9 +42,9 @@ detail later on).
The merge window lasts for approximately two weeks. At the end of this
  time, Linus Torvalds will declare that the window is closed and release the
-first of the "rc" kernels.  For the kernel which is destined to be 5.6,
+first of the "rc" kernels.  For the kernel which is destined to be a.x,
  for example, the release which happens at the end of the merge window will
-be called 5.6-rc1.  The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
+be called a.x-rc1.  The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
  merge new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next
  kernel has begun.
@@ -99,13 +93,13 @@ release is made. In the real world, this kind of perfection is hard to
  achieve; there are just too many variables in a project of this size.
  There comes a point where delaying the final release just makes the problem
  worse; the pile of changes waiting for the next merge window will grow
-larger, creating even more regressions the next time around.  So most 5.x
-kernels go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none
-of them are serious.
+larger, creating even more regressions the next time around.  So most kernels
+go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none of them

I would add another comma:        regressions,

+are serious.
Once a stable release is made, its ongoing maintenance is passed off to the
  "stable team," currently Greg Kroah-Hartman. The stable team will release

and Sasha Levin:
STABLE BRANCH
M:      Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
M:      Sasha Levin <[email protected]>


This can go on separate patch, I think.

Thanks.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Reply via email to