Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> writes: > On 9/22/25 19:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major >>> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process >>> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually >>> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future), >>> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade. >>> >>> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the >>> numbering scheme. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> >> >> Just FYI, I've pretty much shut docs down for the upcoming merge window. >> I'm probably not the only one. >> > > So it is slated for 6.19 then?
If it's not in docs-next (or some other subsystem tree) now then yes, it will wait another cycle. We are at -rc7, after all. jon
