Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> writes: > Replace the closing words with a section that describes why reporting > Linux kernel bugs is more complicated than in other FLOSS projects. > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> > --- > .../admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 67 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
So the text is OK but ... this is now the second section that is essentially a long apology for the kernel process being so difficult. It seems redundant with the other text, and I'm not convinced we need it. Again, length is an impediment to getting people to actually read this stuff; we should be trying to be as concise as we can. Do we really need this? Thanks, jon
