On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 06:42:00AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 20:37:32 -0800 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 07:30:13PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:57:34 -0800 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > This series improves the CPU cost of RX token management by adding an > > > > attribute to NETDEV_CMD_BIND_RX that configures sockets using the > > > > binding to avoid the xarray allocator and instead use a per-binding niov > > > > array and a uref field in niov. > > > > > > net/ipv4/tcp.c:2600:41: error: implicit declaration of function > > > ‘net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_get’; did you mean > > > ‘net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_put’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > > 2600 | > > > net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_get(binding); > > > | > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > | > > > net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_put > > > > I see that net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_get() is lacking a > > stub for CONFIG_NET_DEVMEM=n ... > > > > Just curious how pw works... is this a randconfig catch? I ask because > > all of the build targets pass for this series (build_allmodconfig_warn, > > build_clang, etc.. locally and on patchwork.kernel.org), and if there is > > a config that pw uses that I'm missing in my local checks I'd like to > > add it. > > kunit hit it on our end
Got it, thank you
