> -----Original Message----- > From: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 3:18 PM > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]>; Neal Cardwell > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen De > Schepper (Nokia) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; cheshire <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Vidhi Goel <[email protected]>; Willem de > Bruijn <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill packetdrill > cases > > [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why > this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional > information. > > > > Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 11:47 PM > > > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen De Schepper > > > (Nokia) <[email protected]>; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; cheshire <[email protected]>; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Vidhi Goel > > > <[email protected]>; Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill > > > packetdrill cases > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > > > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional > > > information. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:58 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Linux Accurate ECN test sets using ACE counters and AccECN options > > > > to cover several scenarios: Connection teardown, different ACK > > > > conditions, counter wrapping, SACK space grabbing, fallback > > > > schemes, negotiation retransmission/reorder/loss, AccECN option > > > > drop/loss, different handshake reflectors, data with marking, and > > > > different sysctl values. > > > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > > > Co-developed-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > > > Chia-Yu, thank you for posting the packetdrill tests. > > > > > > A couple thoughts: > > > > > > (1) These tests are using the experimental AccECN packetdrill support > > > that is not in mainline packetdrill yet. Can you please share the github > > > URL for the version of packetdrill you used? I will work on merging the > > > appropriate experimental AccECN packetdrill support into the Google > > > packetdrill mainline branch. > > > > > > (2) The last I heard, the tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ > > > infrastructure does not run tests in subdirectories of that packetdrill/ > > > directory, and that is why all the tests in > > > tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ are in a single directory. > > > When you run these tests, do all the tests actually get run? Just > > > wanted to check this. :-) > > > > > > Thanks! > > > neal > > > > Hi Neal, > > > > Regards (2), I will put all ACCECN cases in the > > tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ > > But I would like to include another script to avoid running these AccECN > > tests one-by-one manually, does it make sense to you? > > Thanks. > > All scripts under tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill are already picked > up for automated testing in kselftests: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=8a405552fd3b
OK, I was using ksft_runner.sh to run all 58 AccECN case one-by-one. But since run_kselftest.sh can accept multiple "-t" arguments, so I will not commit another script with similar functionlaities but just rename all AccECN case with tcp_accecn in the prefix. Thanks. Chia-Yu
