> > parameter (because using c type devices)... Is mknod > > supposed to be used to create the devfiles?? > > The whole idea of devfs is that you *do not* use > mknod to create device nodes. They are created > automatically when the drivers are loaded. > > The purpose of devfsd is only to create legacy > device name links or set permissions/ownership > of device nodes. > > > HTH, > Johannes >
Ok, I managed to install all the 5 cards using devfs (by changing MAX_NUM_DVB from dvb.h to 5)... Problem now is that when doing "make rmmod" I get this... /usr/src/linux/scripts/pathdown.sh: TOPDIR: parameter null or not set ( \ rmmod dvb; \ rmmod dvb_frontend; \ rmmod dvb_demux; \ rmmod saa7146_v4l; \ rmmod saa7146_core; \ rmmod tuner; \ rmmod stv0299; \ rmmod tda8083; \ rmmod SP8870; \ rmmod L64781; \ rmmod VES1820; \ rmmod VES1893; \ rmmod dmxdev; \ rmmod dvb_filter; \ rmmod videodev; \ rmmod i2c-core; \ rmmod dvb_net; \ rmmod dvbdev; \ ) i2c-core: Device or resource busy the output of subsequent lsmod gives: Module Size Used by saa7146_core 0 0 (deleted) i2c-core 13600 0 af_packet 12560 0 (autoclean) usb-uhci 21232 0 (unused) usbcore 50752 1 [usb-uhci] 8139too 12704 1 (autoclean) rtc 5600 0 (autoclean) saa... seems to be "deleted" (???) and i2c-core, even if used by 0, reported to be busy... (!!!) Any one of the driver developpers might know the problem? Could it be the fact that I changed that define in dvb.h? Aurelian -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
