On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:10:37 +0100 Wolfgang Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. His patch isn't ready, IMHO. It's very nice, but I don't think it's > ready: as soon as adding hw_filters=0 (and making this the default, and > only requesting his code with hw_filters=1), this patch is fine, and should > be added to CVS, but not now, when there is no option 'hw_filters=0' yet. I think that a hw_filters option is useful and should be added. BTW, what is the stability level target of the CVS? Is the CVS intended as a playground for developers (so having an imperfect driver for some time is admissable) or has it a sort of "release candidate" meaning? In a development environment the current patch looks good enough to be committed in order to receive more feedback. -- Roberto Ragusa r.ragusa at libero.it -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
