Thomas Schorpp wrote:
cause as i understood you, youre NOT the contents provider
Then you misunderstood me, as I clearly stated I AM the content provider. Please stop labouring the legal point, I have legal rights to decrypt this content, our lawyers say it to be so. Right now I am interested in technical details, rather than a theoretical legal discussion that does not apply in this case.
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
