On Tue, 10 Mar, at 08:51:59AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > I'm not 100% happy with write(2) (which is all we have in sysfs) for > two reasons: > > 1. If we write a file name, eww. That's more complicated, requires > temporary files, has annoying mount namespace issues, etc. > > 2. If we write the full contents, we need to do it in a single call to > write. That means that we can't use cat, which mostly defeats the > purpose. In fact, using cat could be actively harmful.
At this point I'd really like Greg to chime in. In principal, I'm not stricly opposed to using a simple char device provided that it's not essentially a copy and paste of code from drivers/base/firmware_class.c. Greg? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
