On 09/14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > The UEFI memory map is a bit vague about how to interpret the > EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute when it is combined with EFI_MEMORY_RP and/or > EFI_MEMORY_WP, which have retroactively been redefined as cacheability > attributes rather than permission attributes. > > So let's ignore EFI_MEMORY_XP if _RP and/or _WP are also set. In this > case, it is likely that they are being used to describe the capability > of the region (i.e., whether it has the controls to reconfigure it as > non-executable) rather than the nature of the contents of the region > (i.e., whether it contains data that we will never attempt to execute) > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> I will test early next week and provide a tested-by. Thanks. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
