> > Because local_save_flags() does not disable interrupts??
> 
> now that you say so, it does make sense…
> 
> > > Anyway, I would still like to get rid of task_lock() in efi_switch_mm().
> > > Any objections to that?
> >
> > No, not at all.
> okay.

I don’t have any either and thanks for the clear commit message. It makes sense
why task_lock()/task_unlock() should go away.

Regards,
Sai
N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{�y��^n�r��z���h����&���G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m�����z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�

Reply via email to