On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:43 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On 2018-11-29 13:43:58 [-0800], Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:04 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > This bug got handled by Jann Horn, yes? (I remember seeing a related
> > thread go by...)
>
> Correct, fix sits in the tip tree. Nevertheless it was useful to spot
> the other thing.
>
> > > This looks like it comes from commit 21b3ddd39fee ("efi: Don't use
> > > spinlocks for efi vars") because it replaced a spin_lock() with
> > > down_interruptible() in this case. In this case, since pstore_dump()
> > > holds psinfo->buf_lock with disabled interrupts we can't block…
> > >
> > > I have this as a workaround:
> >
> > I'm not sure this is correct...
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> > > index 9336ffdf6e2c..d4dcfe46eb2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> > > @@ -755,7 +755,9 @@ int efivar_entry_set_safe(efi_char16_t *name,
> > > efi_guid_t vendor, u32 attributes,
> > > return -EINTR;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - status = check_var_size(attributes, size + ucs2_strsize(name,
> > > 1024));
> > > + status = ops->query_variable_store(attributes,
> > > + size + ucs2_strsize(name,
> > > 1024),
> > > + block);
> >
> > Why does this change help?
>
> check_var_size() uses false as the argument for `block'.
> check_var_size_nonblocking uses true as the argument for `block'.
> Doing this ops->… allows to pass the `block' argument as received from
> caller. And the functions above already use the `block' argument. Plus
> the next hunk makes sure that `block' is set properly.
Here's the code I see:
if (!block && ops->set_variable_nonblocking)
return efivar_entry_set_nonblocking(name, vendor, attributes,
size, data);
if (!block) {
if (down_trylock(&efivars_lock))
return -EBUSY;
} else {
if (down_interruptible(&efivars_lock))
return -EINTR;
}
status = check_var_size(attributes, size + ucs2_strsize(name, 1024));
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
up(&efivars_lock);
return -ENOSPC;
}
status = ops->set_variable(name, &vendor, attributes, size, data);
up(&efivars_lock);
In the !block case, this will already take the
efivar_entry_set_nonblocking() path. Isn't that sufficient? (i.e. I'm
not sure why I see a change needed in the EFI code, just the
pstore_cannot_block_path() path?
>
> > > if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > > up(&efivars_lock);
> > > return -ENOSPC;
> > > diff --git a/fs/pstore/platform.c b/fs/pstore/platform.c
> > > index b821054ca3ed..9aa27a2c8d36 100644
> > > --- a/fs/pstore/platform.c
> > > +++ b/fs/pstore/platform.c
> > > @@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ static const char *get_reason_str(enum
> > > kmsg_dump_reason reason)
> > > bool pstore_cannot_block_path(enum kmsg_dump_reason reason)
> > > {
> > > /*
> > > - * In case of NMI path, pstore shouldn't be blocked
> > > - * regardless of reason.
> > > + * In case of disabled preemption / interrupts we can't block on
> > > any
> > > + * lock regardless of reason.
> > > */
> > > - if (in_nmi())
> > > + if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())
> > > return true;
> > >
> > > switch (reason) {
> >
> > I'd like to avoid any case where pstore might "miss" a crash report,
> > though... this seems to make it easier for it to fail to record a
> > crash, yes?
>
> Well, if the lock is occupied, yes. But waiting for the completion with
> disabled interrupts isn't much better :)
>
> pstore_cannot_block_path() is used in two places. One caller is taking a
> spin_lock(). So that one could keep using the "old" function.
>
> The other caller uses it before acquiring the semaphore. The non-try
> version can't be used with preemption or interrupts disabled.
>
> You could split those two cases and let the sempaphire user use the
> "(in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())" from above.
preempt.h:#define in_nmi() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
preempt.h:#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0)
NMI is a special case of preempt_count() test. in_atomic() is a
non-zero preempt_count() test. It looks like we want to use
preemptible()?
#define preemptible() (preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled())
So, perhaps:
- if (in_nmi())
+ if (!preemptible())
What do you think?
--
Kees Cook
