* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> The current implementation of efi_mem_reserve_persistent() is rather
> naive, in the sense that for each invocation, it creates a separate
> linked list entry to describe the reservation. Since the linked list
> entries themselves need to persist across subsequent kexec reboots,
> every reservation created this way results in two memblock_reserve()
> calls at the next boot.
>
> On arm64 systems with 100s of CPUs, this may result in a excessive
> number of memblock reservations, and needless fragmentation.
>
> So instead, make use of the newly updated struct linux_efi_memreserve
> layout to put multiple reservations into a single linked list entry.
> This should get rid of the numerous tiny memblock reservations, and
> effectively cut the total number of reservations in half on arm64
> systems with many CPUs.
>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/efi.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 80b11521627a..e90bc32c2670 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -998,7 +998,8 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr,
> u64 size)
> {
> struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv;
> int rsvsize = EFI_MEMRESERVE_SIZE(1);
> - int rc;
> + unsigned long prsv;
> + int rc, index;
>
> if (efi_memreserve_root == (void *)ULONG_MAX)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1009,11 +1010,24 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t
> addr, u64 size)
> return rc;
> }
>
> - rsv = kmalloc(rsvsize, GFP_ATOMIC);
I fixed the following build warning in this patch:
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c:1000:6: warning: unused variable ‘rsvsize’
[-Wunused-variable]
'rsvsize' got entirely orphaned by the patch, so it can be removed.
Thanks,
Ingo
