On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 08:45:00PM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
> On secure boot enabled systems, the bootloader verifies the kernel
> image and possibly the initramfs signatures based on a set of keys. A
> soft reboot(kexec) of the system, with the same kernel image and
> initramfs, requires access to the original keys to verify the
> signatures.
> 
> This patch allows IMA-appraisal access to those original keys, now
> loaded on the platform keyring, needed for verifying the kernel image
> and initramfs signatures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com>

The overall set seems sensible to me, and I see no errors here,

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <se...@hallyn.com>

I do think that replacing the 'rc' with xattr_len in the previous line might
help future readers save a few cycles.

> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index deec1804a00a..9c13585e7d3e 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -294,7 +294,16 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
>                                            iint->ima_hash->length);
>               if (rc == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>                       status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> -             } else if (rc) {
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +             if (rc && func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK)
> +                     rc = integrity_digsig_verify(
> +                                     INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM,
> +                                     (const char *)xattr_value,
> +                                     xattr_len,
> +                                     iint->ima_hash->digest,
> +                                     iint->ima_hash->length);
> +             if (rc) {
>                       cause = "invalid-signature";
>                       status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
>               } else {
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 

Reply via email to