> > Beside, one doesn't need to hold the whole root-fs in ram as it is
> > done with initrd.
> Not true on my opinion. In our system we tried both: root fs is on
> flash disk (mounted ro), initrd gets extracted from image
...
> down, although it was a bit of work to set up all the bit and pieces
> correctly, like scripts which extract and pack the initrd
> image. Biggest
> hassle is to remember to make the changes in the initrd image
> instead of the initrd-based files :)
Seems to be the best way to save ram _and_ flash. A pitty that the
BCL-driver isn't available since this could save also the work you have with
setting the correct links...
Thanks for the infos!
J�rgen
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the command "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the message body.
For more information, see <http://waste.org/mail/linux-embedded>.
