From: Baokun Li <libaok...@huawei.com>

The following concurrency may cause a read request to fail to be completed
and result in a hung:

           t1             |             t2
---------------------------------------------------------
                            cachefiles_ondemand_copen
                              req = xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
// Anon fd is maliciously closed.
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
  xa_lock(&cache->reqs)
  cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(object)
  xa_unlock(&cache->reqs)
                              cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_open
                              // No one will ever close it again.
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
  cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
  // Get a read req but its fd is already closed.
  // The daemon can't issue a cread ioctl with an closed fd, then hung.

So add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info to protect ondemand_id and
state, thus we can avoid the above problem in cachefiles_ondemand_copen()
by using ondemand_id to determine if fd has been released.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaok...@huawei.com>
---
 fs/cachefiles/internal.h |  1 +
 fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
index 7745b8abc3aa..45c8bed60538 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct cachefiles_ondemand_info {
        int                             ondemand_id;
        enum cachefiles_object_state    state;
        struct cachefiles_object        *object;
+       spinlock_t                      lock;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
index 898fab68332b..b5e6a851ef04 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -16,13 +16,16 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release(struct inode 
*inode,
        struct cachefiles_object *object = file->private_data;
        struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache;
        struct cachefiles_ondemand_info *info = object->ondemand;
-       int object_id = info->ondemand_id;
+       int object_id;
        struct cachefiles_req *req;
        XA_STATE(xas, &cache->reqs, 0);
 
        xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
+       spin_lock(&info->lock);
+       object_id = info->ondemand_id;
        info->ondemand_id = CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND_ID_CLOSED;
        cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(object);
+       spin_unlock(&info->lock);
 
        /* Only flush CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW marked req to avoid race with 
daemon_read */
        xas_for_each_marked(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
@@ -127,6 +130,7 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache 
*cache, char *args)
 {
        struct cachefiles_req *req;
        struct fscache_cookie *cookie;
+       struct cachefiles_ondemand_info *info;
        char *pid, *psize;
        unsigned long id;
        long size;
@@ -185,6 +189,14 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache 
*cache, char *args)
                goto out;
        }
 
+       info = req->object->ondemand;
+       spin_lock(&info->lock);
+       /* The anonymous fd was closed before copen ? */
+       if (info->ondemand_id == CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND_ID_CLOSED) {
+               spin_unlock(&info->lock);
+               req->error = -EBADFD;
+               goto out;
+       }
        cookie = req->object->cookie;
        cookie->object_size = size;
        if (size)
@@ -194,6 +206,7 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache 
*cache, char *args)
        trace_cachefiles_ondemand_copen(req->object, id, size);
 
        cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_open(req->object);
+       spin_unlock(&info->lock);
        wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq);
 
 out:
@@ -596,6 +609,7 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_init_obj_info(struct 
cachefiles_object *object,
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        object->ondemand->object = object;
+       spin_lock_init(&object->ondemand->lock);
        INIT_WORK(&object->ondemand->ondemand_work, ondemand_object_worker);
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to