On 2026/1/15 09:21, Hongbo Li wrote:
Hi,Xiang

On 2026/1/14 18:18, Gao Xiang wrote:


On 2026/1/9 18:28, Hongbo Li wrote:
From: Hongzhen Luo <[email protected]>

...

+
+static int erofs_ishare_iget5_set(struct inode *inode, void *data)
+{
+    struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode);
+
+    vi->fingerprint = *(struct erofs_inode_fingerprint *)data;
+    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vi->ishare_list);
+    spin_lock_init(&vi->ishare_lock);
+    return 0;
+}
+
+bool erofs_ishare_fill_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+    struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
+    struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode);
+    struct erofs_inode_fingerprint fp;
+    struct inode *sharedinode;
+    unsigned long hash;
+
+    if (erofs_xattr_fill_inode_fingerprint(&fp, inode, sbi->domain_id))
+        return false;
+    hash = xxh32(fp.opaque, fp.size, 0);
+    sharedinode = iget5_locked(erofs_ishare_mnt->mnt_sb, hash,
+                   erofs_ishare_iget5_eq, erofs_ishare_iget5_set,
+                   &fp);
+    if (!sharedinode) {
+        kfree(fp.opaque);
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    vi->sharedinode = sharedinode;
+    if (inode_state_read_once(sharedinode) & I_NEW) {
+        if (erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(vi->datalayout)) {
+            sharedinode->i_mapping->a_ops = &z_erofs_aops;

It seems that it caused a build warning:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

+        } else {
+            sharedinode->i_mapping->a_ops = &erofs_aops;
+#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_BACKED_BY_FILE
+            if (erofs_is_fileio_mode(sbi))
+                sharedinode->i_mapping->a_ops = &erofs_fileio_aops;
+#endif
+        }

Can we introduce a new helper for those aops setting? such as:

void erofs_inode_set_aops(struct erofs_inode *inode,
               struct erofs_inode *realinode, bool no_fscache)

Yeah, good idea. So it also can be reuse in erofs_fill_inode.

And how about declearing it as "int erofs_iode_set_aops(struct erofs_inode *inode, 
struct erofs_inode *realinode, bool no_fscache)"; because the compressed case may 
return -EOPNOTSUPP and it seems we cannot break this in advance.

yes, `int` return is good.

 And can we mark it inline?

you could move this one to internal.h.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


Thanks,
Hongbo

Reply via email to